Change to mobile view. Ask The Headhunter Feb 12 Column: Opponents of marriage equality also predict an increase in children born outside wedlock and divorce. Christians Who Changed Their World. For example, Edie Windsor sued the U. As states like California grapple over gay marriage, New England has found that it can be a small fillip to the economy. We also calculate that if an Australian state government were to move first on the issue, it would gain a large slice of this wedding spend.
Some observers, most notably competitiveness guru Richard Florida, argue that tolerant policies and environments — including for gay people — are essential for nurturing creative workers who will drive economic growth.
The cost of gay marriage – in dollars and cents
Read this Family's pain at the heart of day one of the aged care royal commission One wrong click, and a criminal can access your phone. Allowing same-sex couples to marry has also produced similar positive effects in Massachusetts and the Netherlands, according to studies conducted by my colleagues and me at the Williams Institute at UCLA. Any additional state and federal spending on benefits would be outweighed by savings from lower cash assistance and Medicaid spending. Tuesday, the California Supreme Court made the most recent in a series of legislative and judicial decisions on gay marriage nationwide: Share on Facebook Share on Twitter. Recent Articles Weekly Review by: Ask The Headhunter Feb
Get journalism built for thinkers like you. Well init apparently does. I have a simple message to Australian politicians currently considering same-sex marriage: Unfortunately, Koppelman does not provide a pragmatic analysis of same-sex marriage. Love and companionship make most people happy and generally represent two of the key reasons why couples marry. Films in translation — voices for all: But what about spending on Social Security, Medicare, military veteran, and other federal benefits?